Europe
: Alternative broadband wirelesstechnologies are being forced to compete
in the mobility market and coulddisrupt the evolution of 3G networks
if potential showstoppers are addressed, according to a new report,
The Role and Impact of WiMAX and Proprietary BWA Technologies published
by Analysys Research, the global advisers on telecoms, IT and media.
The report shows
that emerging broadband wireless technologies could blur the boundaries
between cellular and fixed broadband wireless solutions. The rapid
growth in DSL and cable availability in developed markets means that
the emerging wireless technologies must offer mobility to avoid being
marginalised as niche fixed broadband wireless solutions. "Offering
fixed broadband Internet access using wireless technologies is a tough
business case, with wafer-thin margins," according to Dr Mark
Heath, co-author of thenew report. "The breakthrough opportunity
will only come by learning from the success of cellular, extracting
significant price premiums for mobility and offering a more profitable
service mix."
Broadband
wireless systems from Flarion, IPWireless and ArrayComm, which all
support wide-area mobility, are already deployed in a variety of commercial
and trial networks around the world. Using an assortment of proprietary
and standards-based technologies, such as OFDM and W-CDMA TDD, they
claim advantages over 3G, including faster throughput, lower cost
and lowerlatency. They are to be joined by WiMAX (IEEE 802.16e) and
MobileFi (IEEE 802.20), both of which are aiming to combine the benefits
of mobility, standardisation and multivendor support, albeit with
commercial launches unlikely prior to 2007.
"The
battle is now on between the vendors to secure the necessary global
economies of scale to be a serious alternative to mainstream 3G technologies,"
according to Mark Heath. "Success will demand extensive deployment
by mobile operators, who are generally accepted to be the key customer
targets. They have valuable assets such as base-station sites, large
existing customer bases and strong marketing capabilities that will
be crucial to achieving commercial success." He adds, "They
could decide to deploy alternative technologies alongside, or instead
of, 3G as a means of offering differentiated services and driving
new revenues."
While
mobile operators represent a tantalising opportunity for vendors of
these emerging technologies, there is still much to do to persuade
mobile operators to invest in these rather than take up the options
they have for 3G standard enhancements such as HSDPA. A number of
critical points need to be addressed, such as identification of a
compelling mix of service propositions, provision of clear evidence
of performance and cost gains and blueprints for integration with
existing base stations and confirmation of the availability of necessary
spectrum. These challenges are underlined by the results of initial
service deployments. "Early trials generally show a poor return
compared to mainstream mobile operator voice and messaging services,"
says co-author Dr Alastair Brydon. "Either services appear expensive
to customers, which will mean adoption will remain low, or they are
pitched in direct competition with fixed broadband services, when
they deliver only around one percent of the revenue per Mbyte of traditional
cellular services."
"Mobile
operators demand rigorous evidence of system performance in a loaded
network," says Brydon. "They also need to understand the
implications and costs of integration with their existing networks,
particularly given that the new technologies are not currently supported
by mainstream cellular vendors such as Nokia, Ericsson and Motorola."
Brydon points out that spectrum will also be an important consideration.
"With the exception of IPWireless's W-CDMA TDD technology, none
of these systems has a dedicated spectrum allocation. Mobile operators
may need to acquire new spectrum or seek relaxation of the rules surrounding
their existing spectrum allocations something they don't need
to do with HSDPA."
The report
ranks each broadband wireless technology against six key mobile operator
requirements. While each has its own specific strengths and weaknesses,
no single technology currently comes close to meeting all needs, making
HSDPA appear a safer deployment option, at least in the short-term.
Apart
from mobile operators, the wildcards in the future of alternative
broadband wireless technologies will be the various other types of
player that are not currently active in the mobility market. "Fixed
operators, ISPs, WLAN hotspot providers and major consumer and business-to-business
brands could deploy the technologies to offer a mix of voice and data
services in direct competition with mobile operators," says Mark
Heath. "But they are going to need a really strong business case
and wireless voice over IP will be critical to boosting revenues and
profitability." He warns, however, that in the absence of mass
deployment by mobile operators and the reductions in equipment prices
resulting from economies of scale, some or all of these new BWA technologies
may be relegated to become niche last-mile access solutions.
Time
may not be on the side of proprietary technologies, potentially leaving
forthcoming IEEE 802.16 and 802.20 standards to resolve the outstanding
issues. IEEE 802.16, in particular, benefits from strong backing from
the WiMAX Forum and Intel, although much about the standard, particularly
its mobile variant IEEE 802.16e, is still undefined. "The WiMAX
Forum needs to move from building awareness to clarifying the capability
and role of the
technology," says Alastair Brydon.
The Role
and Impact of WiMAX and Proprietary BWA Technologies presents the
real facts of what these technologies will (and will not) do, including
assessments of early commercial launches and market trials. The report
identifies potential showstoppers for each of the new technologies
and considers the most likely evolution paths for Flarion, IPWireless,
ArrayComm and WiMAX.