Europe
UK: If the cellular industry has its way, we should soon have access
to live TV transmissions on our 3G mobile phones.
How the TV signals
reach the mobile, however, depends on which standards are adopted
- Brian Lancaster, a commercial engineer with AlanDick, the broadcast
and communications infrastructure specialist, explains the technology
behind this quiet revolution…
June 2006 will be an important
date for football fans the world over - it's the start of the World
Cup, which takes place in Germany.
That dateline will also
be an important one for the global cellular industry as well, as most
leading-edge networks want to have their real-time TV-on-a-mobile
services operational by then.
But relaying TV - and video-on-demand
services - to a cellular handset involves a lot more than building
an analogue or digital TV tuning system into the mobile.
As users of handheld TVs
will have discovered, TV signals do not propagate well to TVs on the
move.
The cellular networks must
instead turn to new technologies such as DVB-H (Digital Video Broadcasting
- Handheld) and 3.5G transmissions to meet their needs.
Following its ratification
by the European Technical Standards Institute (www.etsi.org), DVB-H
has moved off the drawing board and into the real world, with a consortium
of European firms – including Nokia, MTV and YLE (a Finnish
broadcasting company) – already trialling the technology in
Finland.
The DVB-H/IP datacasting
trial, which started in early March, gives Finnish triallists real-time
access to a cluster of TV channels, including BBC World, CNN, Eurosport
and MTV, on Nokia 7710 handsets equipped with a plug-in transcoding
device.
DVB-H, however, is more
than just receiving digital TV transmissions. The technology, like
digital terrestrial and satellite, allows users to receive ancillary
files, including pictures, video clips and music, for viewing and
listening on the move.
Unlike digital terrestrial
and satellite transmission standards, however, DVB-H uses a `data
burst' or time-slicing approach to the carriage of signals across
the available radio spectrum.
Using this transmission
technology reduces DVB-H power consumption on mobile phones to roughly
the same level as a voice call, although the handset vendors are still
working hard to develop lower-power display screens.
Unlike 3.5G technology,
more of which in moment, DVB-H does not use the normal cellular transmission
path to carry the real-time TV signals to the mobile.
Signals are, instead, carried
across a separate network, although it is expected that the base stations
for commercial DVB-H deployments will be co-located, where appropriate,
with existing GSM and/or 3G base stations.
DVB-H's main claim to fame
is that it supports frame rates of up to 25 frames per second (fps),
compared to the 5 fps seen on existing video streaming services. Standard
TV broadcasts operate at between 25 and 30 fps.
The difference between
streamed video files seen on mainstream 2G and 3G mobiles (and networks)
at the moment was clearly illustrated at the giant CeBIT show in Germany
recently, when Siemens showed off its DVB-H prototype handset.
At the show, held in Hanover
during March, Siemens showed its prototype handset sending text messages
at the same time as receiving a DVB-H transmission.
The Siemens prototype also
had an integral 128 megabytes of memory for program storage, as well
as a memory card slot for expanded storage facilities.
Here at AlanDick we think
that the interactive element of DVB-H has significant potential. Users
of a mobile could, for example, watch a series of film trailers on
their handset and then reserve a seat at the movies using the return
data channel.
Vodafone Germany is planning
to stage a trial of DVB-H transmissions using around 100 of the Siemens
prototypes in a major German city later this year, whilst O2 is planning
to work with NTL and Nokia for a six-month trial of DVB-H amongst
250 customers in Oxford.
Although details of the O2 trials were still at the planning stages
at press time, the game plan is to use a single-frequency network
with nine base stations covering a 120 square kilometres area around
Oxford.
O2 has yet to confirm which
handset vendor it will be using for its trials, although it should
be noted that Siemens is not alone in developing DVB-H-compliant mobiles.
Samsung, for example, also
showed off its first DVB-H handset at CeBIT. The handset, which supports
both CDMA and GSM networks, making it suitable for global usage, does
not feature any recording facilities.
Critics of DVB-H point
out that movie trailer interaction by customers is nothing new, but
the key feature of DVB-H is that it enables easy viewing of TV transmissions
- and interaction, if appropriate – in real time, just like
on a regular TV.
The 3.5G alternative
But DVB-H isn't the only
TV-on-a-mobile technology on the block, as users of 3G handsets on
Hutchison 3G, Vodafone and Mobilkom Austria networks will be aware.
The alternative technology
to DVB-H is known generically as video streaming, which has the advantage
that it can operate across multiple mobile standards, ranging from
2.5G (GPRS) right through to 3.5G.
3G video streaming is already
quite popular in several countries, but is not really suitable for
real-time TV transmissions because of the relatively low (150 to 220
kilobits per second - Kbps) speeds currently available on 3G networks.
Plans currently call for
most 3G networks in Europe and Asia to support mobile data speeds
of 384 Kbps within the next few years, but even this speed is only
just enough to support a VHS tape quality TV transmission with minimal
bandwidth headroom.
For faster transmissions
we have to turn to 3.5G technology, better known in some circles as
HSDPA (High Speed Downlink Packet Access), which is now entering trials
on both sides of the Atlantic.
The development of HSDPA
is thanks to a number of software modifications for 3G networks that
Lucent, Motorola and Nortel have developed in concert with carriers
such as Cingular in the US and O2 in Europe.
By tweaking the way in
which data is transmitted from the base station to the mobile, Lucent
and Nortel claim that data transmissions can be speeded up from the
current 384 Kbps maximum with 3G to around 3.6 megabits per second
(Mbps) on 3.5G.
Eventually, the two vendors
claim, it should be possible to push data download speeds up to a
theoretical maximum of 14.4 Mbps on the downlink and 5.8 Mbps on the
uplink.
In trials, Cingular and
O2 say they have observed download speeds of, respectively, 2.0 and
2.9 Mbps, on their test 3.5G services.
Even under a full 3G cell site loading, data speeds in excess of 1
Mbps are expected - more than enough room for point-to-point mobile
narrowcasts of various channels.
Although HSDPA is a technical
compromise compared to DVB-H's shiny new technology, HSDPA has the
key advantage that it uses existing 3G network infrastructure with
software, rather than hardware, modifications.
Thanks to this fact, it
looks likely that 3.5G technology could reach the market more quickly
than DVB-H.
In the US, Lucent and Cingular
remain coy on 3.5G timescales. Europe's O2 is more ebullient. It expects
to introduce commercial HSDPA on its 3G networks some time during
2007.
Next year's World Cup could
force their hands on timescales, so our best guess here at AlanDick
is that 3.5G-based TV-on-a-mobile transmissions could be soft launched
as early as the spring of next year, but don't expect too many handsets
to be available.
- Main copy ends – 1231 words
- Optional box-outs follow
Boxout 1 - national TV-on-a-mobile systems also in development
Even though the European and US carriers are developing DVB-H and
3.5G TV-to-mobile technology apace, it's worth noting that other systems
are also in development.
Japan and South Korea have been working on their own systems for the
past few years.
The Japanese system - known as ISDB-T (Integrated Services Digital
Broadcasting - Terrestrial) is currently at the field test stage.
The South Korean system - known as DMB (Digital Media Broadcasting)
- is expected to enter field testing later this year and is already
seen in handsets from LG and Samsung.
These Asian developments could confuse the marketplace as, even though
Japan and South Korea are not on the GSM map, they each have two 3G
networks already operational.
Just to make life even more interesting, Qualcomm has developed yet
another TV-to-mobile system based around the ASTC (Advanced Television
Systems Committee) standard.
The bad news with Qualcomm's multicasting system, known as MediaFLO
(Forward Link Only), is that it is proprietary and designed specifically
for the 700-megahertz waveband.
The danger with these country-specific (and incompatible) services
is that the cellular industry could end up with a similar range of
disparate systems seen with 2G and non-GSM networks.
Boxout 2 - Crown
Castle plans commercial DVB-H deployment in US
In the US, Crown Castle is well on its way to rolling out a commercial
DVB-H network operating at 10 Mbps, following trials of the technology
in concert with Nokia in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Crown Castle has more than 10,000 of its cellular towers and hold
a national US spectrum licence, so the logistics involved with upgrading
its network to support DVB-H are not that great.
Samsung has already announced plans to work with Crown Castle on its
US network, with the Korea company supplying handsets for use on the
fledgling Mobile Media service.
According to Samsung, its handsets for use on the Mobile Media service
will have two-inch QVGA colour screens capable of showing 226,000
colours at rates of up to 30 frames per second.
Most interestingly of all, Samsung says that handsets will receive
DVB-H transmissions at data speeds of around 300 kilobits per second.
Although this data speed is lower than many experts have predicted,
it's around the same speed as used on sub-channels on digital terrestrial
and satellite TV transmissions.
On a regular TV, these transmissions are around the same quality as
a regular VHS tape, but for a mobile phone with a small screen, the
picture quality is more than sufficient.
Boxout 3 –
what frequencies will DVB-H operate at?
One of DVB-H’s advantages is that it can be used across a wide
range of frequencies.
In the US, Crown Castle has been using the L-band (1.5 gigahertz)
for its Pittsburgh trials and plans to use the same frequency on its
planned national network.
In Europe, L-band availability is limited, as several frequencies
in the waveband have been assigned to Digital Audio Broadcast radio
transmissions.
European broadcasters and carriers tend to favour Band III (VHF),
Band IV or Band V, with Band IV (470 to 650 megahertz) being the favourite
owing to propagation and interference levels.
The critical factor in getting DVB-H rolled out commercially could
be the European Commission, which will have to decide on which frequencies
the DVB-H broadcasters can use.
This could pose a problem, as different countries within the EU member
states have allocated different frequencies in L-band and Bands III,
Iv and V.
Achieving consensus on which frequencies to use for DVB-H could take
time – time that the networks and broadcasters don’t want
to waste, owing to potential lost revenue and the danger that other
TV-on-a-mobile standards could gain a foothold.
Boxout 4 - why is AlanDick interested in these technologies?
With more than two decades of experience in servicing the needs of
the broadcast and cellular infrastructure industries, AlanDick has
a history of being a one-stop shop for broadcasters and cellular networks
worldwide.
Whether networks
opt for 3.5G or DVB-H - or as yet undeveloped – technologies
- AlanDick will be able to meet the installation and deployment needs
of the broadcasters and cellular carriers as they roll out their new
services.
Because of the
costs involved, we expect many carriers to co-locate their DVB-H transmission
systems with their existing cellular networks.
Whichever standard
asserts itself as the medium of choice for TV-on-a-mobile transmissions,
AlanDick's technologies and skill sets will help ensure that your
favourite programs reach your mobile phone as efficiently as possible.